Home › Finance

By David Kim•Last Updated July 31, 2025

How Housing Tenure Shapes Generosity: The Links Between Renting, Buying, and Giving

The Core Connection: Why Housing Tenure Affects Generosity

Whether someone rents or buys can shape their capacity and propensity to be generous. Research finds homeowners, on average, donate more than renters-even after accounting for income, wealth, tax incentives, and mobility. The mechanisms include higher net worth that enables larger gifts, itemized deductions that can reduce the cost of giving for those who qualify, and greater residential stability that fosters stronger community ties and civic engagement-all of which are associated with increased giving and volunteering [1] . A broader literature also ties homeownership to stability and social capital, factors linked with civic participation and community involvement [2] .

Mechanism 1: Wealth Effects and the Capacity to Give

Homeownership often builds household wealth through equity, and greater net worth can increase the
capacity
for larger or more frequent donations. One analysis documented a dramatic swing in homeowner equity during the Great Recession, underscoring how changes in housing wealth can amplify or constrain giving capacity over time [2] . In general, higher wealth correlates with larger charitable contributions; studies of owners versus renters suggest this wealth channel explains part of the giving gap, but not all of it [1] .

Real-world example: A household that built equity over 10 years might earmark appreciated capacity for annual gifts to a local food bank and a donor-advised fund, whereas a renter with similar income but less accumulated wealth may limit gifts to smaller monthly amounts. When housing prices fall, both households may reduce giving, illustrating how housing wealth cycles affect generosity.

How to apply it:

Track your net worth and set a giving percentage target that adjusts with your financial cushion. During periods of higher equity or savings, consider increasing your giving rate.
Use a reserve policy for philanthropy (for example, a 3-6 month cash buffer) before committing to multi-year pledges, especially if your housing costs are variable.

Challenges and solutions: Housing wealth is illiquid. To avoid overcommitting, align gifts with liquid assets and cash flow. Consider smaller recurring donations that can be paused if needed, and reassess annually.

Mechanism 2: Tax Incentives and the Cost of Giving

Tax policy can lower the after-tax cost of charitable giving for those who itemize deductions. Homeowners are more likely to itemize in some periods due to mortgage interest and property tax deductions, which can enhance the tax benefit of giving. Research examining the owner-renter gap identifies tax deductibility as an important predictor of the size of contributions, though it does not fully explain why owners give more than renters [1] .

Real-world example: A homeowner who itemizes could bunch donations into a single tax year to surpass the standard deduction, thereby increasing the value of the charitable deduction. A renter taking the standard deduction may obtain less tax leverage but could still use strategies like donor-advised funds during high-income years.

Step-by-step to implement:

Estimate whether you will itemize or take the standard deduction for the current year.
If itemizing, consider timing gifts (bunching) or using appreciated assets where available. If not itemizing, plan a flat annual giving budget aligned to cash flow.
Keep documentation from qualified charities and consult a tax professional for deduction rules and thresholds.

Alternatives and caveats: Tax rules change. If you are unsure about itemizing or eligibility, consult a qualified tax advisor or visit the Internal Revenue Service’s official guidance by searching for “IRS charitable contributions publication” on the agency’s website.

Mechanism 3: Mobility, Stability, and Community Ties

Residential stability is associated with stronger neighborhood ties, civic engagement, and social capital, which can translate into more giving and volunteering. Homeowners typically move less frequently than renters, building durable relationships with local organizations and schools-settings that often catalyze generosity and in-kind support [2] . In empirical work focused on generosity, the likelihood of donating is inversely related to mobility, highlighting how staying put increases the probability of giving at all [1] .

Real-world example: A long-term homeowner volunteers as a PTA treasurer and coordinates annual drives, while a renter who relocates frequently may support causes online but has fewer place-based opportunities to lead. Both contribute; stability mainly changes the mode, frequency, and depth of engagement.

How to apply it if you rent: Join recurring online giving circles and time-bound local projects. Use neighborhood groups, faith communities, or mutual aid networks that welcome short-term volunteers. These channels reduce the friction caused by moves while keeping your generosity active.

Beyond Money: Time, Skills, and Place-Based Generosity

Generosity includes volunteering, mentoring, and in-kind support. Evidence linking homeownership with engaged parenting and community involvement suggests that stable housing can encourage non-monetary generosity, such as organizing activities or reducing negative time trade-offs at home [3] . Broader research also connects homeownership with civic engagement, a form of community generosity that extends beyond donations [2] .

Practical steps for renters and owners:

Pick one recurring role (monthly) that fits your schedule-finance committee, fundraising outreach, or tutoring-to build continuity.
Offer in-kind skills: accounting, marketing, translation, or tech support can be as valuable as cash.
When moving, request remote roles or hand off responsibilities to maintain continuity for the organization.

Is the Link Causal? What the Research Says

Recent academic work examining multiple channels-tax deductibility, wealth, and mobility-finds homeowners donate substantially more than renters, and these channels explain part but not all of the gap. Even after extensive controls, homeowners still donate roughly 20 percent more, and the authors conclude the positive correlation is likely causal, while recognizing heterogeneity across cohorts and contexts [1] . Related housing research underscores that the social benefits of homeownership depend on economic cycles and market conditions, which can amplify or diminish these effects over time [2] .

How Renting Can Support Generosity-Strategically

Renting can still align with robust generosity by designing systems around cash flow and mobility. Because renters may itemize less frequently and move more often, the keys are budgeting, automation, and portable engagement.

Step-by-step plan for renters:

Set a giving percentage of monthly income (for example, 1-5% to start) that fits rent and essentials, then automate.
Use recurring micro-donations and cause-neutral funds (e.g., community foundations) to stay engaged through moves.
Focus on remote-friendly volunteering and time-bound local events as you settle into new neighborhoods.

Potential challenges: Unpredictable rent increases and moving costs can disrupt giving. Build a small giving buffer (one month of your typical donations) and pause automation during transitions. Reassess your plan within 60 days after a move.

How Homeowners Can Align Housing & Philanthropy

For owners, consider how equity, taxes, and stability can support a structured giving plan. While tax benefits vary by year and personal circumstances, itemizers may reduce the after-tax cost of giving. Stability also enables leadership roles in local organizations.

Step-by-step plan for owners:

Annually review whether you will itemize. If yes, evaluate bunching gifts or timing large donations. If no, maintain a fixed annual giving budget tied to cash flow.
Allocate a portion of any housing windfalls (e.g., refinancing savings or equity extraction decisions) toward charitable goals-only when your emergency fund and essential upkeep are funded.
Leverage stability to take on recurring roles that compound impact, such as treasurer, board member, or program lead.

Risk management: Housing costs can spike (repairs, taxes). Protect your giving plan by reserving funds for maintenance and reassessing commitments after major expenses.

Intergenerational Factors and Equity Considerations

Parental wealth and homeownership status are linked to young adults’ odds of becoming homeowners themselves, particularly for middle-income households, where parental support can bridge down payments and access to credit. These intergenerational dynamics shape who accrues housing wealth-and, downstream, who gains the capacity to give more financially over time [4] . Renters without family wealth may instead emphasize time, skills, and peer-based giving models while they build financial capacity.

Putting It All Together: A Practical Giving Playbook

If you rent: Start with a modest, automated monthly gift aligned to a percentage of income; choose portable volunteer roles; and use annual check-ins after moves. Consider cause areas you can support remotely to maintain continuity.

If you own: Integrate giving into annual tax planning; consider bunching strategies if you itemize; and leverage residential stability for leadership roles. Revisit your plan after major housing events (purchase, refinance, repair).

For everyone: Treat generosity as a portfolio: combine cash, time, and skills. Adjust allocations as your housing situation and finances change. When uncertain about tax rules, consult a credentialed tax professional or search the Internal Revenue Service’s official publications for guidance on charitable contributions.